Unveiling Fraudulent Probability Claims in McDonald’s France 2011 Promotion

From: Vincent B. Le Corre
Subject: IMPORTANT, PAY ATTENTION, 1 chance out of 4 France 2011
Date sent: February 07, 2023, 18:04 +0800 (China Standard Time)
To: Adam Rogalski (Legal Attaché/State Department), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Cc: Edward Lehman
Note: since Assistant Legal Attaché Adam Rogalski told me on 2021-09-20 that he was “one of the FBI representatives,” I assume that this communication was transferred to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

Dear Mr. Rogalski,

Please pay attention to what I am going to explain in this email. It’s quite important. Please make certain it’s transferred to the right people/investigators.

It’s a demonstration that, and for the year 2011 in France, when McDonald’s criminally claimed consumers had 1 chance out of 4 to win instantly, it could only have meant per attempt in which 1 attempt = 1 game stamp.

Look at attached file picture_1_france_2011.jpg:

1. McDonald’s claims 1 chance out of 4 to win instantly whether the consumers buy a menu best of or a menu maxi best of.
2. McDonald’s claims that a menu best of gets the customer, and future victim, 2 game stamps.
3. McDonald’s claims that a menu maxi best of gets the customer, and future victim, 4 game stamps.
4. Therefore, the probability of winning is the same whether the customer, and future victim, buys a menu best of or a menu maxi best of: 1 chance out of 4 in both cases. It is what is shown.
5. Axiom of extension. Two sets are equal if and only if they have the same elements.
6. Since 2 ≠ 4, the probability of winning can’t obviously be based per set. It can only be based per attempt in which 1 attempt = 1 game stamp.

Now, look at picture 2 and 3 (file names picture_2_france_2011.jpg, picture_3_france_2011.jpg).

There is something barely readable written. It’s the same thing as I explained to New York Times journalist Constant Méheut:

https://www.tojournalists.com/open-letters/explanations-sent-to-constant-meheut-may-25-2022/

McDonald’s claims in the fine print that the odds are even better than 1 chance out of 4 per attempt in which one attempt is one game stamp.

McDonald’s claims that the odds one winning are in fact 1 chance out of 2.

The key point of this email is not to explain to the FBI/DOJ what I already explained to Constant Méheut even though it’s very important. THE KEY POINT WAS TO MAKE YOU UNDERSTAND THAT MCDONALD’S FRAUDULENT 1 CHANCE OUT OF 4 STATEMENT IN FRANCE IN 2011 CAN INITIALLY ONLY BE INTERPRETED AS PER ATTEMPT IN WHICH 1 ATTEMPT = 1 GAME STAMP (i.e. 1 SINGLE PEEL-OFF, 1 SINGLE STICKER).

And of course, subsequently, McDonald’s NEVER warns their victims, that it’s a lie, and therefore a fraud.

Yours sincerely,

Vincent Le Corre

To gain a clearer understanding of the sequence of events in this case, I invite you to view a detailed timeline at the following link:
https://www.ECTHRwatch.org/timeline/mcdonalds/
This timeline provides a comprehensive overview of the key milestones and developments.